HomeThe German chancellor and the outbreak of warPagina 28

JPEG (Deze pagina), 667.69 KB

TIFF (Deze pagina), 5.77 MB

PDF (Volledig document), 76.42 MB

the very beginning of the crisis, they were
immediately confronted by fundamental ques­ ix
tions essential to their vital interests, of a
{ii kind which did not arise for Great Britain nl
until France and Belgium became involved
in the war. But even from the German
statements of the case, I cannot ünd any
{ suggestion that Russia had intended or deter­ I
mined on war in the year 1914. I ünd on the
other hand that it has again and again been
stated that Russia intended war in 1916 at gi
i a time when her preparations would have _
{ been completed. Real evidence for this is `
wanting; it is a charge probably as baseless
i as the similar charge made against Great
i Britain ; but given that it was a just suspicion, .
it is a reason why Germany should have forced
the crisis in 1914 when Germany was ready, t
but Russia was not yet ready, and is therefore `
real evidence against the charge that Russia I
was directly responsible for the war. i
I should not be in the least surprised or
disturbed to iind that as the crisis developed
there arose a definite war party at St. Peters-
burg, who, when the challenge to them had g
once been made, were willing and even eager ä
to take it up, and were as ready to submit `§
the great questions at issue to the arbitrament ï*