HomeThe German chancellor and the outbreak of warPagina 22

JPEG (Deze pagina), 639.37 KB

TIFF (Deze pagina), 5.77 MB

PDF (Volledig document), 76.42 MB

rg ,4

the whole military power, not only of Austria
but of Austria and Germany, intervening be-
ggë tween her and the open sea. She would
Y therefore have lost, and lost if not permanently
at least probably for many generations, all
;.p hopes of attaining that which had been the
ë governing object of her whole policy since
the time of Peter the Great. Vas it to be
expected that she should tacitly acquiesce in
such a solution. of the Eastern question?
Is it conceivable that any Russian Czar or
Russian Minister could have remained quiet
` before such a situation?
I And if we analyse further, we shall find
that the essential cause underlying these events
i was that Germany had come forward as a
r party directly and immediately interested in
· Eastern Europe. If it is the case, as has been
said, that the road to Constantinople was to
4 be found not so much through Vienna as
if through Berlin, this is due to the fact that
A Germany has now come forward as a rival
‘ claimant for control over the Imperial City.
5 Russia might have acquiesced for an indeünite
period in the maintenance of the status
quo; no one could suggest that she
could have looked on in passive inaction
while Germany seized upon that which